Skip to main content

Do any curators actually accept free submissions?

Feature Request

BBC CW Radio thought my track was good enough to feature on air, but not one curator. Why is it ok for a curator to make more than an artists? Most can’t even listen to the full length of song and Paying for submissions to just be declined is just a scam. Let alone the risk of botted playlists. My question is arent sites like this just making playlisters gatekeepers of artists success? And sometimes they can decline you and snatch your money after listening to a minute when they never actually had intention of adding that song to playlist. They just wanted some quick and easy money. It’s a huge disservice to artists.

Posted by Third-Born ·
Status: Completed1 comment

Log in to comment and vote

Comments1

  • DP Team

    Team•

    Aug 28

    Hello Third-Born,

    Thank you for reaching out to us. We understand your concerns regarding the approval rate of your submissions through our platform.

    To help us investigate this matter further, could you please provide us with more specific details regarding your submissions? Specifically, we would need to know when these submissions were made and what type of submission they were (e.g., standard, premium, recommendation).

    We want to emphasize that DailyPlaylists serves as a marketplace to connect artists with real curators. The decision to accept or decline a submission rests entirely with the individual curators, and we do not influence or guarantee any specific approval rates.

    However, we can share some general statistics for your reference. For instance, the acceptance rate for recommendation submissions is approximately 25%. We hope this provides some context, and we look forward to receiving the additional information from you so we can look into your specific case.


    Thanks,
    DP Team