Curators that are not loggin in for months
The new “Already Approved” function is genius.
If I may suggest something: you might consider adding a fourth category for curators who haven’t been active for, say, six months or a year. I sometimes read online that some of them are no longer willing to stay active on their daily playlists, yet they still remain in the system.
Deleting them would probably be too drastic, but limiting their role or visibility quite strongly could be a fair solution.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments2
DonSolAre
Mar 11
•Merged request
•1 vote
The new “Already Approved” function is genius. If I may suggest something: you might consider adding a fourth category for curators who haven’t been active for, say, six months or a year. I sometimes read online that some of them are no longer willing to stay active on their daily playlists, yet they still remain in the system. Deleting them would probably be too drastic, but limiting their role or visibility quite strongly could be a fair solution.
The new “Already Approved” function is genius.
If I may suggest something: you might consider adding a fourth category for curators who haven’t been active for, say, six months or a year. I sometimes read online that some of them are no longer willing to stay active on their daily playlists, yet they still remain in the system.
Deleting them would probably be too drastic, but limiting their role or visibility quite strongly could be a fair solution.
DP Team
Mar 11
Hi DonSolAre,
Thank you for the feedback! We do remove inactive Premium Curators, though we have not implemented this system for Standard Curators. I’ll share with the team.
All the best,
DP Team